Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy

toc This is the introduction to Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. The different taxonomical levels can be viewed individually via the navigation bar or below this introduction as embedded pages. =Synopsis:= This is an update to Bloom's Revised Taxonomy which attempts to account for the new behaviours and actions emerging as technology advances and becomes more ubiquitous. Bloom's Revised Taxonomy describes many traditional classroom practices, behaviours and actions, but does not account for the new processes and actions associated with Web 2.0 technologies, infowhelm (the exponential growth in information), increasing ubiquitous personal technologies or cloud computing or Web 3.0 Collective & ubiquitous intelligence. Bloom's Digital Taxonomy lends itself to problem and project based learning where the student must work through the entire process of development and evaluation. The [|21st Century Fluency Projects] is an excellent example of how to work through the project or problem based learning frame work.
 * Bloom's Digital Taxonomy** isn't about the tools or technologies rather it is about using these to facilitate learning. Outcomes on rubrics are measured by competence of use and **most** importantly the **quality of the process or product**. For example. Bookmarking a resource is of no value if the resource is inappropriate, invalid, out of date or inaccurate.

Bloom's Digital Taxonomy has been translated into Spanish by Claudia Uribe de Piedrahita, the Director of Eduteka and is available at []

Key Resources
This infographic links Blooms Digital Taxonomy to the communication spectrum.

Bloom's Digital Taxonomy - Quick Sheets.
The Bloom's Digital Taxonomy Quicksheets are resources I have created as a quick and easy summary of the six different taxonomic levels of Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. They define the different taxonomic levels, provide the Digital Taxonomy Verbs with some possibilities for classroom use.

toc =Introduction and Background:=

Bloom's Domains of learning
In the 1956, [|Benjamin Bloom,] an educational psychologist working at the University of Chicago, developed his [|taxonomy of Educational Objectives]. His taxonomy of learning objectives has become a key tool in structuring and understanding the learning process. He proposed that learning fits into one of three psychological domains (see below illustration 1):
 * the **Cognitive** domain – processing information, knowledge and mental skills.
 * the **Affective** domain – emotions, attitudes and feelings.
 * the **Psychomotor** domain – manipulative, manual or physical skills.
 * [[image:bloom's_cognitive_domains.jpg width="471" height="370" caption="Blooms Domains of learning. Made with C-Map"]] ||
 * Blooms Domains of learning. Made with C-Map ||

[|Benjamin Bloom] is best know for, **Bloom's Taxonomy** which examines looks at the cognitive domain. This domain categorizes and orders thinking skills and objectives. His taxonomy follows the thinking process.

The Cognitive Domain - Bloom's Taxonomy
This categorized and ordered thinking skills and objectives. His taxonomy follows the thinking process. You can not understand a concept if you do not first remember it, similarly you can not apply knowledge and concepts if you do not understand them. It is a continuum from Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) to Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Bloom describe each category as a gerund. They are arranged below in increasing order, from lower order to higher order.


 * [[image:blooms_taxonomy.jpg width="234" height="282" caption="Drawing 1. Bloom's Taxonomy"]] ||
 * Drawing 1. Bloom's Taxonomy ||

Bloom's Revised Taxonomy
In the 1990's, a former student of Bloom, Lorin Anderson and [|David Krathwohl], revised Bloom's Taxonomy and published this- Bloom's Revised Taxonomy in 2001. Key to this is the use of verbs rather than nouns for each of the categories and a rearrangement of the sequence within the taxonomy. They are arranged below in increasing order, from **Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS)** to **Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)**.


 * [[image:blooms_revised_taxomony.jpg width="213" height="255" caption="Drawing 2. Bloom's Revised Taxonomy"]] ||
 * Drawing 2. Bloom's Revised Taxonomy ||

Bloom's Revised Taxonomy Sub Categories
Each of the categories or taxonomic elements has a number of key verbs associated with it.
 * Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS)**
 * **Remembering** - //Recognising, listing, describing, identifying, retrieving, naming, locating, finding//
 * **Understanding** - //Interpreting, Summarising, inferring, paraphrasing, classifying, comparing, explaining, exemplifying//
 * **Applying** - //Implementing, carrying out, using, executing//
 * **Analysing** - //Comparing, organising, deconstructing, Attributing, outlining, finding, structuring, integrating//
 * **Evaluating** - //Checking, hypothesising, critiquing, Experimenting, judging, testing, Detecting, Monitoring//
 * **Creating** - //designing, constructing, planning, producing, inventing, devising, making//
 * Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)**

The elements cover many classroom activities and objectives but they do not address the new objectives presented by the emergence and integration of Information and Communication Technologies in to the classroom and the lives of our students. This revision is fundamentally based on the revised taxonomy proposed by Anderson et al, but is more inclusive of digital technologies and digital cognitive objectives. =Bloom's as a learning process.= Bloom's Taxonomy in its various forms represents the process of learning. It has been simplified in some case like the **Three Story Intellect** (Oliver Wendell Holmes and Art Costa), but it still essentially represents how we learn.

Before we can **understand** a concept we have to **remember** it Before we can **apply** the concept we must **understand** it Before we **analyse** it we must be able to **apply** it Before we can **evaluate** its impact we must have **analysed** it Before we can **create** we must have **remembered, understood, applied, analysed,** and **evaluated**.

Some people may argue about that you do not require some of the stages for each and every task, action or process; some too may argue about the necessity to reach the creation level for all activities. This is the choice of the individual.

**Is it important where you start? Must I start with remembering?**
I don't think it is. The learning can start at any point, but inherent in that learning is going to be the prior elements and stages.

=Bloom's Digital Taxonomy=

=Bloom's Digital Taxonomy Summary Map=


 * [[image:Bloom's_Digital_Taxonomy.jpg width="800" height="610" caption="Bloom's Digital Taxonomy Concept map."]] ||
 * Bloom's Digital Taxonomy Concept map. ||

Bloom's Digital Taxonomy and Collaboration.
In the Diagram above, Collaboration is included as a separate element as well as some elements being shared. Collaboration can take many forms (see above) and value of the collaboration can vary hugely. This is often independent of the mechanism used to collaborate. Also collaboration is not an integral part of the learning process for the individual, you don't have to collaborate to learn, but often your learning is enhance by doing so. Collaboration is a 21st Century skill of increasing importance and one that is used throughout the learning process. In some taxonomic levels the collaboration verbs are included as an element of Bloom's Digital taxonomy and in others its is just a mechanism which can be use to facilitate higher order thinking and learning.

**Collaboration is not a 21st Century Skill, it is a 21st Century Essential.** In a recent blog post from the official google blog, Google identified the following as key traits or abilities in 21st Century Employees: “... **communication skills**. Marshalling and understanding the available evidence isn't useful unless you can effectively communicate your conclusions.” “... **team players**. Virtually every project at Google is run by a small team. People need to work well together and perform up to the team's expectations. ” //Source: []// If we look at UNESCO's publication “[|The four pillars of Education,] Learning: The Treasure within” Collaboration is a key element of each of the four pillars. ([]) [10] So to prepare our students, our teaching should also model collaboration. A vast array of collaborative tools are available; wikis, classroom blogs, collaborative document tools,social networks, learning management systems - Many are available at no cost. If you have not yet tried them, look at: These tools are enablers of collaboration, and potentially enablers of 21st century teaching and learning. include component="page" page="Bloom's - Remembering" title="Remembering"
 * Learning to know
 * Learning to do
 * Learning to live together
 * Learning to be
 * Wikis – wet paint and wiki spaces
 * Classroom blogs – edublogs, classroomblogmeister, blogger, WordPress
 * Collaborative document tools – Google documents, zoho documents, icloud, microsoft 365
 * Social Networks – ning, facebook, twitter, instagram, snapchat, pinterest, tumblr
 * Learning managements systems – Moodle, Blackboard, edmodo, Canvas, JoomlaLMS, SharepointLMS, Ning, LAMS
 * Social bookmarking - Delicious, DIIGO, Digg, Reddit, Pinterest, StumbleUpon
 * Website creation tools - weebly, google sites, wix, sway

include component="page" page="Bloom's - Understanding" title="Understanding"

include component="page" page="Bloom's - Applying" title="Applying"

include component="page" page="Bloom's - Analysing" title="Analysing"

include component="page" page="Bloom's - Evaluating" title="Evaluating"

include component="page" page="Bloom's - Creating" title="Creating"

=Resources:=

Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York.

Crockett, L. Jukes, I. Churches, A. (2011) Literacy is not enough. Corwin Press Crockett, L., & Churches, A. (2017). Mindful assessment: the 6 essential fluencies of innovative learning. Bloomington, IN : Solution Tree Press. Crockett, L., & Churches, A. (2017). Growing global digital citizens: better practices that build better learners. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Global Digital Citizenship Foundation. 21st Century Fluencies. http://globaldigitalcitizen.com

[|http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom's_Taxonomy] http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/bloomrev/ http://www.ops.org/reading/blooms_taxonomy.html http://teachingacademy.wisc.edu/archive/Assistance/course/blooms2.htm http://www.techlearning.com/showArticle.php?articleID=196605124

Web 2.0 Tutorials
Without a doubt one of the best resources on the web for web2.0 Technologies is the [|commoncraft] show. Lee LeFever's productions are clear, simple and to the point; most of all they are "In Plain English". Here are the links:
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/Twitter
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/photosharing
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/bookmarking-plain-english
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/video-social-networking
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/video-wikis-plain-english
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/rss_show
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/blogs
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/video-googledocs
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/mylocation
 * http://www.commoncraft.com/wetpaint

=Acknowledgements:= For assistance, discussion and often punctuation... Miguel Guhlin, Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach, Alan Knightbridge, Sue Cattell, Raewyn Casey, Marg McLeod, Doug DeKock, Rod Fee